Articles

Chronomentrophobia, the fear of clocks and, more broadly, of time itself, can be seen as a lens through which to examine how humans grapple with our temporality. This phobia isn't simply a fear of an object but a deeper anxiety concerning the nature of existence, mortality, and the relentless flow of time. There is a deeply subjective experience of time that is other than the objective clock time of scientific measurement. There is a lived, relational, and deeply personal nature of our experience of time, particularly in the context of our awareness of living and being toward death.

The Tyranny of the Tick: Chronomentrophobia

Chronomentrophobia, the fear of clocks, is not merely a surface-level aversion to a common household object. It is a profound existential confrontation with the very nature of time, existence, and mortality. Through an existential-phenomenological lens, we can delve into the lived experience of this phobia, exploring what clocks bring into stark relief and what they simultaneously obscure.

What Clocks Remind Us Of:

• The relentless flow of time: Clocks are concrete manifestations of time's passage. Each tick, each sweep of the hand, is an undeniable reminder that time is moving forward, irrevocably. This constant movement can evoke a sense of unease, a feeling of being carried along by a current we cannot control. For the chronomentrophobic, this awareness becomes a source of intense anxiety, a feeling of being trapped in time's relentless flow.
• Our own finitude: By marking the passage of time, clocks implicitly remind us of our own mortality. They highlight the limited time we have on this earth, the inevitable march towards old age and death. This awareness can be particularly distressing for those struggling with chronomentrophobia, as the clock becomes a symbol of their own impending demise.
• The weight of the past and the uncertainty of the future: Clocks not only measure the present but also connect it to the past and the future. They remind us of time already spent, of opportunities missed, and of the unknown that lies ahead. This can lead to feelings of regret, anxiety, and a sense of being overwhelmed by the weight of time.
• The pressure of schedules and deadlines: In modern society, clocks are inextricably linked to schedules, deadlines, and the pressure to be productive. They become instruments of control, dictating our daily routines and imposing a sense of urgency on our lives. For the chronomentrophobic, this association can amplify their anxiety, turning the clock into a symbol of external pressure and a lack of personal autonomy.

What Clocks Hide From Us:

• The qualitative nature of time: While clocks measure time quantitatively, in discrete units, they fail to capture the subjective, qualitative experience of time. Time can feel fast or slow, depending on our experiences and emotions. A moment of joy can feel fleeting, while a moment of pain can feel like an eternity. Clocks, with their uniform ticking, obscure this richness and fluidity of lived time.
• The present moment: By constantly directing our attention to the past and the future, clocks can distract us from the present moment. They encourage us to dwell on what has been or to worry about what will be, rather than fully engaging with the here and now. This can lead to a sense of disconnection from our own lives and a feeling of being perpetually out of sync with the present.
• The possibility of timelessness: Some spiritual and philosophical traditions suggest that there is a dimension of reality beyond the linear flow of time, a state of timelessness or eternity. Clocks, with their focus on measurable time, can obscure this possibility, trapping us in a limited understanding of existence.
• The mystery of being: Ultimately, clocks attempt to quantify something that is inherently mysterious and unfathomable: the nature of being. They offer a superficial explanation of time, but they fail to address the deeper questions about existence, consciousness, and the meaning of life. By focusing on the measurable aspects of time, they can distract us from these more profound inquiries.

Edmund Husserl's Phenomenology of Time Consciousness

Husserl's concept of temporality is central to his phenomenology, as he argues that consciousness is fundamentally temporal. He rejects the traditional view of time as a linear, objective flow, instead focusing on the subjective experience of time as it is lived by consciousness. Key to his understanding is the concept of the "living present," which is not a static point but rather a dynamic flow encompassing three dimensions:

• Retention: This refers to the immediate past that is still present in our consciousness. It's not a memory in the traditional sense, but rather the fading echo of what has just occurred, allowing us to perceive continuity in experience (e.g., the notes of a melody as they unfold).  
• Primacy of the "now": The "now" is the central point of experience, the moment of immediate presence. However, it's not an isolated point but is intrinsically linked to retention and protention.
• Protention: This is the anticipation or expectation of what is about to happen. It's not a fully formed prediction, but rather a horizon of possibilities that shapes our experience of the present (e.g., anticipating the next note in a melody).  

These three dimensions are intertwined and constantly influencing one another, creating a dynamic and fluid experience of time. Husserl argues that this "internal time-consciousness" is the foundation for our experience of objective time. It's through this subjective flow of retention, "now," and protention that we are able to perceive events as occurring in succession and to grasp the passage of time.

Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Embodied Time

Merleau-Ponty, heavily influenced by Husserl, further developed the concept of temporality by grounding it in the lived body and its interaction with the world. He rejected the idea of time as a pre-existing container or a series of discrete moments, instead emphasizing its dynamic and embodied nature. For Merleau-Ponty, time is not something we are "in," but rather something we "inhabit" through our bodily existence.

Central to his view is the notion of the "body-subject," which is not a passive recipient of sensory information but an active agent that engages with the world through its movements and perceptions. Our experience of time is thus intrinsically linked to our bodily actions and our perception of the world around us. For instance, the rhythm of our breathing, the movement of our gaze, and the anticipation of reaching for an object all contribute to our sense of temporal flow.

Merleau-Ponty also emphasized the interconnectedness of past, present, and future, rejecting the idea of a linear progression of distinct moments. He argued that the past is not simply behind us, but continues to influence our present actions and perceptions. Similarly, the future is not a blank slate, but is anticipated and prefigured in our present experience. This dynamic interplay of past, present, and future creates a "temporal horizon" that is constantly shifting and evolving as we interact with the world. In essence, for Merleau-Ponty, time is not an objective reality but a dimension of our lived experience, shaped by our embodied engagement with the world.

Gabriel Marcel and the Intersubjective Being of Temporality

Gabriel Marcel, an existentialist philosopher, approached temporality with a focus on its lived and intersubjective dimensions, contrasting it with the objective clock time of scientific discourse. He distinguished between "having" and "being," where "having" relates to our relationship with objects and measurable time, while "being" concerns our participation in existence and our relationships with others. For Marcel, time is not merely a linear progression of moments but is deeply intertwined with our experiences of hope, memory, and intersubjectivity. He emphasized the importance of "fidelity" in understanding temporality. Fidelity is not simply a passive adherence to the past but an active engagement with it that shapes our present and future. It involves a creative remembering that allows us to integrate past experiences into our current lives, giving them meaning and direction. This act of fidelity is inherently temporal, as it bridges the gap between past, present, and future. Furthermore, Marcel highlighted the role of "hope" in our time experience. Hope is not just a passive wish for a better future but an active orientation towards it that influences our present actions. It is a temporal phenomenon that allows us to transcend the limitations of the present moment and to project ourselves into the future.

This understanding of temporality is deeply connected to Marcel's view on love and its implications for the question of life after death. He didn't offer love as a formal "logical proof" of an afterlife but rather as an existential insight arising from the lived experience of profound connection. His reasoning hinges on the nature of love as a mode of "being with," not "having." This distinction is crucial: "having" relates to objects and possessing them, while "being" concerns our participation in existence and our relationships with others. Love, for Marcel, is a deep communion that transcends mere physical presence. This "being with" implies a connection that surpasses the physical body and its eventual demise. When we truly love someone, we affirm their inherent value and uniqueness, wishing for their well-being in the present and beyond their physical life. This desire for their continued existence, Marcel suggests, is not merely sentimental but a recognition of something essential about their being that cannot be extinguished by death.

Marcel famously stated that "to love someone is to say to them, 'Thou shalt not die.'" This isn't a literal command but an expression of the deep hope and conviction that the bond of love cannot be broken by death. This conviction, he argued, arises from the very nature of love as a participation in a reality that transcends the temporal and physical realm. Marcel emphasized the role of hope in our understanding of existence, and love, for him, is intrinsically linked to this hope—a hope that goes beyond the limitations of our earthly existence. This hope is not mere wishful thinking but a fundamental orientation towards a reality that transcends death. In essence, Marcel's conception of temporality is deeply personal and relational, emphasizing how our experiences, relationships, and hopes shape our understanding and experience of time. His argument is that the experience of love, with its profound connection to another person, affirmation of their being, and inherent hope for their continued existence, points towards a reality beyond death. It's not a logical proof in the strict sense, but rather an existential insight based on the lived experience of love, suggesting that the very nature of love as a "being with" another person implies a connection that death cannot ultimately sever.

Conclusion:

Chronomentrophobia reveals the profound impact of clocks on our lived experience. They are not merely neutral instruments for measuring time but powerful symbols that evoke complex emotions and existential anxieties. By understanding what clocks remind us of and what they hide from us, we can gain a deeper appreciation of the chronomentrophobic experience and perhaps find ways to reconcile ourselves with the enigmatic nature of time.

Sources

• "Never Standing Still" - Eurobiz Japan. Accessed December 23, 2024.
• "Chronophobia" by Samir Kadri. MentalHealth.com. Accessed December 23, 2024.
• "The time–emotion paradox" by Sylvie Droit-Volet, and Sandrine Gil. National Library of Medicine. Accessed December 23, 2024.
• "The Illusion of Time: Why the Clock is Not Your Master" by Marcus Dickinson. Medium. Accessed December 23, 2024.
• "Clocks in Folklore and poems" - DutchTimePieces.com. Accessed December 23, 2024.
• "Phenomenology and Time-Consciousness" by Michael R. Kelly. Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy. Accessed December 23, 2024.
• "Husserl: Time Consciousness" - PhilPapers.org. Accessed December 23, 2024.
• "Retention and protention" - Wikipedia. Accessed December 23, 2024.
• "Time-consciousness in computational phenomenology: a temporal analysis of active inference+ by Juan Diego Bogotá and Zakaria Djebbara. Neuroscience of Consciousness. Accessed December 23, 2024.
• "I Belong To Time And Space: Maurice Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Time" by Alec Borislow. Medium. Accessed December 23, 2024.
• "Merleau-ponty Corps" - Vaia. Accessed December 23, 2024.
• "In Transit to the Afterlife" by Geoffrey Karabin. Genealogies of Modernity. Accessed December 23, 2024.
• "Time in the Philosophy of Gabriel Marcel" by Helen Tattam. Notre Dam Philosophical Reviews. Accessed December 23, 2024.